Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Garcia

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2012No. 33,895; Docket No. 31,470Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

{35} I concur in the overbreadth, vagueness, and general/specific dispositions and do not write separately to discuss aspects of those dispositions. I concur, as well, in the as-applied disposition, but write separately only to express my view that the CDM statute, as applied here, should be analyzed under strict scrutiny and not intermediate scrutiny. I do so not only because I see the CDM statute as content-based under the circumstances here. I also do so because I see the CDM statute as a statute that can all too easily give rise to prosecutorial overreach and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. City of Albuquerque v. Pangaea Cinema LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. ButtUtah Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API