Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. National Park Medical Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1998No. 97-2221, 97-2226, 97-2229PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, District Judge.

This case involves the question of whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., preempts Arkansas’ so-called “Patient Protection Act,” Acts 505 and 1193 passed by the Arkansas General Assembly in 1995 (the Arkansas PPA). The Arkansas General Assembly’s goal in passing the PPA was to ensure “that patients ... be given the opportunity to see the health care provider of their choice.” AkkCode Ann. § 23-99-202. However, various “health care insurers” within the meaning of the Arkansas PPA brought this declaratory judgment action…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Van Natta v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  3. Mountain Pure, LLC v. Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. National Park Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Draper v. Wellmark, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API