Legal Opinion
Bikowicz v. Nedco Pharmacy, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, J.
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cobb, J.), entered October 19, 1984 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, granted defendant Eleonore Hinse’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against her.
On or about April 17, 1968, defendant Dr. Eleonore Hinse commenced treating plaintiff Marilyn Bikowicz (hereinafter plaintiff) for migraine headaches by prescribing injections of Talwin. Subsequently, a drug called Dramamine was added to the continuing therapy. On February 14, 1973, Hinse gave plaintiff a prescription for four ampoules of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Renda v. FrazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Bernardo v. Ayerest Laboratories, Division of American Home ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rowntree v. HunsuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Bikowicz v. Nedco Pharmacy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Parrott v. RandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Carter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Adams v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.