Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cassell v. Collins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1995No. COA94-1157Published

1Dissent

Judge Martin, John C.,

dissenting.

I agree with Judge Greene that the duty owed to plaintiff in this case is determined by plaintiff’s status as a licensee. I further agree that an owner of land normally owes a licensee only the duty to refrain from willfully injuring the licensee or wantonly and recklessly exposing the licensee to danger; but that if the owner of land is engaged in active conduct or “affirmative negligence,” “the owner must exercise reasonable care for the protection of a licensee.” DeHaven v. Hoskins, 95 N.C. App. 397, 400, 382 S.E.2d 856, 859, disc. review denied, 325 N.C.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Cannon v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Murrow v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Lindsey v. MassiosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API