Hinckley v. Krug
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; J. W. McKinley, Judge. Action by A. G. Hinckley against August Krug on an account for professional services rendered by plaintiff, as an attorney, for defendant. From a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
This appeal was taken by the defendant from the judgment and from the order refusing a new trial. It is an action to recover $675 for services as attorney at law, alleged to have been rendered defendant “between the first day of June, 1889, and the first day of June, 1891, in prosecuting and defending suits, and for like services, at his request, in drawing, copying, and engrossing of divers conveyances, deeds, and other paper writings, and for divers journeys and other attendances,” etc. The defense consists of a general denial and of six counterclaims for damages alleged to have…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gabbert v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- In Re MundySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934