Legal Opinion

A.H. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1996No. 1 CA-SA 95-0332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

Kenneth Inman, the Real Party in Interest, is the Defendant in a criminal case in which he pled guilty to attempted sexual conduct with a minor. The Defendant, although conceding his guilt, insists that his conduct was not as serious as the State suggests, and he subpoenaed the Victim to testify at a mitigation hearing. The Victim, through her guardian ad litem, seeks review of the trial judge’s order requiring her to give videotaped testimony to be used at the *629mitigation hearing. We accept jurisdiction but deny relief. We hold that the trial court may, in the sound…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Szoke v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. State v. FentonArizona Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Ah v. Super. Ct. in and for Mohave Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API