A.H. v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
Kenneth Inman, the Real Party in Interest, is the Defendant in a criminal case in which he pled guilty to attempted sexual conduct with a minor. The Defendant, although conceding his guilt, insists that his conduct was not as serious as the State suggests, and he subpoenaed the Victim to testify at a mitigation hearing. The Victim, through her guardian ad litem, seeks review of the trial judge’s order requiring her to give videotaped testimony to be used at the *629mitigation hearing. We accept jurisdiction but deny relief. We hold that the trial court may, in the sound…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Szoke v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. FentonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Ah v. Super. Ct. in and for Mohave Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. MunningerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.