Phipps v. State

Appellant seeks review of the denial of a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm that portion of the lower court’s order denying, as successive, Appellant’s claim that his sentence was not legally enhanced. We also affirm without prejudice Appellant’s claim seeking relief pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), as he insufficiently *566pled this claim. We vacate that portion of the order ruling on a gain time claim not raised in Appellant’s motion.

Appellant correctly asserts that the trial court failed to address…