State v. Baker, Alias Bland, Alias Drew
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion
The only questions presented for our consideration, arise upon the motion in arrest.
The allegations of the information being to the effect that the numerous distinct articles of property described or attempted to be described as stolen, were all owned by the same person, were in the same place, were all taken at one and the same time, and were all of the value of fifty dollars, such taking was but a single offense of larceny. State v. Cameron,40 Vt. 555; State v. Newton, 42 Vt. 537; State v. Emery, 68 Vt. 109,34 A. 432, 54 A.S.R. 878.
At common law simple larceny or theft was of two kinds,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
- Melvin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
- Bennett v. Hayden, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.