Krodel's Assigned Estate
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 118, Oct. T., 1904, by Emma E. Krodel, from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in re Assigned Estate of P. A. Krodel and wife. Exceptions to report of William P. Harnish, Esq., auditor. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The appellant in this case is the wife of P. A. Krodel, with whom she joined in executing a general deed of assignment for the benefit of creditors. The facts are the same as in Pager’s Appeal (Krodel’s Estate No. 1), decided in an opinion filed this day. She appeals as a creditor of the assigned estate, and her objection to the distribution made by the court below is to the allowance of fees to counsel for minority creditors who excepted to the assignees’ account to test the validity of claims presented for payment, and resulted in developing the unusual state of facts…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weed's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Craig Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1978