Legal Opinion

Stone v. Conkle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1939No. Civ. 10545PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

The plaintiff, George C. Stone, is the assignee of one Carroll Bucher and of the firm of Faulkner, Doyle & Sanford of their account against defendants and respondents for legal services rendered and for costs advanced in the sum of $1162.50. Carroll Bucher is an attorney at law, as are also George C. Faulkner, William T. Doyle and Henry G. Sanford, who compose the law firm of Faulkner, Doyle & Sanford. The respondents, Joseph Conkle and Myrtle Conkle are husband and wife. Prior to 1936, re spondent Myrtle Conkle had been committed to Agnew State . Hospital for the insane upon the complaint of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Estate of DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wolf v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Guardianship of CookinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Flessas v. Marine National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Guardianship of ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API