Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Bryant

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1905No. 5,394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Henry Circuit Court; William O. Barnard, Special Judge. Action by William J. Bryant against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Bailway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBobinson, J.

Appellee sued for the value of certain household goods which he averred were delivered by him to appellant to be shipped by appellant from New Castle, Indiana, to appellee at Bockford, Forth Carolina, but which it is averred were either lost or destroyed by aj>pellant, and never delivered to appellee. Judgment in appellee’s favor. Overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, asked on the ground, among other things, that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, is the only question argued.

1. An agent of appellee’s went to appellant’s station agent at New Castle, Indiana, inquired…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Myrick v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Railroad Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Insurance Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parham v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. SeeleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API