Legal Opinion

Abram v. Wackenhut Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 8, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-71739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Title VII complaint for failure to file the complaint within 90 days of plaintiff’s receipt of the EEOC “right-to-sue” letter. For the reasons given below, defendant’s motion is denied.

Plaintiff’s complaint bears a filing date of May 2, 1980, and alleges that the EEOC notice of the right to sue was received on January 23, 1980. From the face of the complaint, therefore, it appears that the plaintiff’s complaint was not filed in a timely manner under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f). Plaintiff at this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George L. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALGREEN’S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. McQueen v. E. M. C. Plastic Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington v. WhiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Yelverton v. Blue Bell, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API