Legal Opinion

Close v. Flesher

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Charles S. Close against Addison B. Flesher and anutner. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

On the face of the complaint the case is this: The defendants, being owners of “a certain system of dress-cutting,” and of a school for teaching dress-cutting and sewing, by written contract of sale transferred the school and its good will to the plaintiff, and engaged to supply him with the system, without which he was unable to conduct the school. Afterwards the defendants opened a similar school, to which they entice plaintiff’s pupils, and they refuse to furnish their system to the plaintiff. By consequence the plaintiff has sustained damage to the amount of $2,000, for which he demands…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Savage v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Fargo v. New York & New England RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McKinney v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Johnston Harvester Co. v. MeinhardtNew York Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dayton v. WilkesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owen v. PartridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Forman v. HealeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sheehy v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Von Bremen v. MacMonniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Sheehy v. Bronx Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API