Legal Opinion
Casas v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 2014PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered October 3, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, upon the parties’ motions and cross motions, declared that defendant’s answer was stricken by operation of an October 2006 order and that trial of this action shall be limited to the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The conditional preclusion order entered in Supreme Court on October 31, 2006 (the October 2006 order), which required defendant to produce certain discovery, or an affidavit explaining why it was unable to produce the discovery, within 30 days…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Auqui v. Seven Thirty One Ltd. PartnershipNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- AWL Industries, Inc. v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ramos v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nieves v. Citizens Advice Bureau Jackson Avenue Family ResidenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Silva v. LakinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Willis v. Keeler Motor Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Citizen Watch Co. of Am., Inc. v. Zapco 1500 Inv., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Citizen Watch Co. of Am., Inc. v. Zapco 1500 Inv., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.