Legal Opinion

Union Colony v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Petition for writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The petition for the awarding of the writ of man-damns in this case, sets out that the petitioners are corporations, doing business in "Weld county, and that they are owners of and interested in ditches, appropriating water from the Cache-la-Poudre river, in water district No. 3. It states that a referee was appointed to take testimony in said water district, under the provisions of the irrigation act of February 19, 1879; that due notice was given, and the testimony of all persons attending was taken, as required by the act, and duly returned by the referee. That thereafter two several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Council of Glencoe v. People ex rel. OwenIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Castello v. St. Louis Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Ex Parte Jesse HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Ex Parte Myra Clarke WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1839

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Nichols v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Greenwood Cemetery Land Co. v. RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Corthell v. MeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API