Legal Opinion

State v. Glidden

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1985No. 84-341PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether the Trial Court {Nadeau, J.) erred in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion for a new trial, on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, filed three years after his convictions. We find no error on the part of the trial court, and therefore we affirm.

The defendant was indicted in June, 1980, on charges of second degree murder, RSA 630:l-b, and second degree assault, RSA 631:2 (Supp. 1979), as a result of an April 1, 1980, incident which occurred outside the Black Lantern Bar in Farmington, New Hampshire. After his arrest, the defendant retained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. GliddenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. State v. ColbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. SylviaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. State v. FecteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API