Legal Opinion

New River Lumber Co. v. Tennessee Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions

PROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Scott County.— IloN. Hugh C. Kyle, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNEy

The complainant is a corporation engaged in the lumber and stave business, and for several years has operated a sawmill at Nick’s Creek, Tenn.

The defendant Tennessee Railway 'Company owns sixty* miles of railroad in Tennessee, and connects with the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company at Oneida, Tenn. Under an agreement with the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, the Tennessee Railway Company received freight on its line for interstate shipment, and it is conceded that it was engaged in interstate transportation.

Nick’s Creek and Norma are two stations…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Clark Bros. Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. Mulberry Hill Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. First American Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Development Co., L.P.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brown v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. County of Shelby v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API