Prendergast v. Nelson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClinton, J.
Today this court, to the best of my knowledge, for the first time in its history renders what is, for the most part, an advisory opinion. In this respect it lamentably disregards its constitutional functions as a court. This course, if followed in the future, has ominous implications for the future political welfare of this state.
We have said on numerous occasions that the courts may not pass upon the constitutionality of a *123statute except at the suit of a person whose rights are adversely affected by the provisions of the statutes which are challenged as unconstitutional. State ex rel.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Metropolitan Utilities District v. Merritt Beach Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Stanton v. MattsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.