City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Saylor
I agree with the majority’s treatment of Taxpayers’ cross-appeal issue regarding the availability of refunds. I differ, however, with the decision to sustain the award of credits.
'As to the matter Of credits, initially, I agree with the majority that the Commonwealth Court erred in implementing a rule of ' construction favorable to Taxpayers. See Majority Opinion, at 954 n. 4. In the refunds/credits arena, the approach of construing ambiguities in favor of the government is based, in part, upon the principle that recompense for overpayments of voluntarily paid taxes (that is, taxes not paid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Board of Revision of Taxes, City of Philadelphia v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.