Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd v. Wikileaks
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; DISSOLVING PERMANENT INJUNCTION; AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Having considered Plaintiffs’ pleadings, the relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, DISSOLVES the stipulated permanent injunction between Plaintiffs and Defendant Dynadot, and sets the hearing and briefing schedule on the pending motions.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Konrad Alexander Stimson v. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026