Moncrief v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
A jury found appellant guilty of murder in killing another by shooting him with a shotgun; the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for a term of thirty years.
Sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. To indicate the factual basis for his contentions it is enough to say that through the testimony of one Joey Deaton the State proved appellant made several *631incriminating statements concerning why he shot and killed the deceased, and appellant countered with testimony from many witnesses that Deaton’s reputation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Moncrief v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Lusk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Hedicke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Blevins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.