Legal Opinion

Triplett v. Voros

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1996No. 17778PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant, Kara Triplett, appeals from a judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas in favor of appellee, Judith Voros, on Triplett’s claim under the Odometer Rollback and Disclosure Act. Because the trial court erred in failing to grant Triplett summary judgment on the issue of liability, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a determination of Triplett’s damages.

In March 1995, Triplett purchased a 1973 Chevrolet Corvette from Voros. At the time of sale, the odometer read 60,158 miles. The actual mileage of the vehicle, however, was well in excess of one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flint v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Baek v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Moon v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Ohio Ex Rel v. Midway Motor Sales, 07ap-744 (6-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API