Legal Opinion

James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1935No. 17557Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges that his confession should not have been admitted in evi dence against him because he says the statements therein “did not conduce to establish his guilt.” He seems to rely upon an expression in Musgrave v. State, 11 S. W., 927, containing the language quoted. In that case the court was discussing the provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (present article 727, C. C. P.) which admits in evidence confessions not made under the formalities required by statute if statements contained in the confession are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Crouchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Kennington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Musgrave v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API