Legal Opinion
Nance v. NYPD
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 13, 2002No. Docket No. 01-7345PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Harold Nance, pro se and informa pauperis, appeals from a district court order construing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as a motion to reopen, denying it, and, accordingly, denying as moot his motion for a preliminary injunction. See Record on Appeal (“ROA”) docs. 28 (Order), 30 (Notice of Appeal).
In November 1999, Nance filed a § 1983 complaint charging that in September 1999, he was arrested without “proper cause,” and was subjected to “illegal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- John Lucille v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Synergistics, Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Jevic Holding Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors on behal v. CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2021