Legal Opinion · Concurrence

General Motors Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Review Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 2005No. 4-04-0735Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE STEIGMANN,

specially concurring:

I agree with both the reasoning and the result reached in the majority opinion in this case, but I write separately because of the concerns expressed by my distinguished colleague in dissent. I share many of those concerns, particularly about the inconsistencies in the Franchise Act and the problems it creates in a free-market society. Nonetheless, despite concerns about the wisdom of the Franchise Act, which the dissent expresses well, neither the wisdom nor the desirability of that legislation is subject to review by this court. “Our role in evaluating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. LantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Serio v. HevesiNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API