Legal Opinion

Alvin H. Watkins, Inc. v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1966No. 21644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

We will refer to plaintiffs in error as Employer and the Fund and to defendants in error as the Claimant and the Commission.

The Fund, on behalf of the Employer, had previously admitted liability to the Claimant on workmen’s compensation based on permanent partial disability to the extent of 5% as a working unit on account of a back injury. Claimant had been offered and had accepted corrective surgery known as a laminectomy, and the extent of the disability was determined following the operation.

Thereafter, the Claimant petitioned the Commission to reopen his case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metros v. Denver Coney IslandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Womack v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Tague v. Coors Porcelain CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API