Legal Opinion
Bidstrup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 7, 2001No. 99-CV-208; No. 99-CV-209; No. 99-CV-210; No. 99-CV-211; No. 99-CV-212; No. 99-CV-213; No. 99-CV-214; No. 99-CV-215; No. 00-1607PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DYKMAN, PJ.
¶ 1. The Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS) appeals from an order directing it to grant Medical Assistance benefits to the eight Respondents, after some of the Respondents prevailed in a related federal suit. DHFS argues that the Respondents' claims for these benefits are barred by a number of statutory and common law rules. The Respondents counter that they should be allowed to maintain their claims because they did not receive proper notice of their appeal rights in an initial termination. We agree that the Respondents received improper notice. However, we conclude…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Gerald Born, and Thomas SchleitwilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph LeeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Bergmann v. McCaughtryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 45,581 Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph LeeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bidstrup v. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001