Nelson Dotson, Ruthie Mae Moton, Cross-Appellees v. The City of Indianola, Ms., Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
We face cross-appeals over the issue of whether the city of Indianola has been motivated by a discriminatory purpose in its annexation attempts. We are persuaded that the conclusions of the district court regarding purposeful discrimination drawn from facts found to be undisputed are not adequate for our review and may be internally inconsistent and inappropriate for summary judgment when viewed against the permissible use of race to remedy voting act violations. We remand for trial of any genuine issues of material fact.1
I
On four separate occasions from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bassett v. Town of TaylorsvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- David Rogath, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. v. Werner E.R. Siebenmann, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Independent Turtle Farmers of Louisiana, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Bailey v. DanielsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Dotson v. CITY OF INDIANOLA, MISS.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.