Legal Opinion

Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Department of Interior

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1992No. 90-4761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

This case is for the birds — thousands of them. And we mean that in no facetious sense.

At issue is a non-development easement on 3800 acres of land in East Texas, containing high-quality wetlands and wildlife habitat essential to migratory waterfowl. The Little Sandy Hunting and Fishing Club donated the easement to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in an effort to guarantee that the wetlands would be preserved in their pristine state without the corrupting effect of commercial, agricultural, and industrial development. By accepting the easement, the Fish and Wildlife…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Department Of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Shenandoah Ecosystems Defense Group v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  3. Heather S. Ex Rel. Kathy S. v. WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  4. SHENANDOAH ECOSYSTEMS DEFENSE v. US Forest Serv.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API