Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooper v. Roger's of Orlando, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 31, 1972No. 71-644Published

1DissentMager, Judge

(dissenting) :

I must respectfully dissent.

This is an appeal by Vance Cooper and Marie Cooper, his wife, plaintiffs below, from a final summary judgment entered in favor of Roger’s of Orlando, Inc., defendant below.

After reviewing the record I am of the opinion that an issue of material fact exists which would preclude the entry of summary judgment. Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 305; Ham v. Heintzelman’s Ford, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 264.

The operator of a public place (restaurant) owes his invitees the duty to use due care to maintain the premises in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Nance v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Warner v. Florida Jai Alai, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Emile v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Sparks v. OberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API