Legal Opinion

Fong v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 10, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 604, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in determining that a landowner whose building permit was revoked by the Planning and Zoning Appeals (the ‘Board’) could not *825properly appeal the Board’s decision to the Superior Court without citing in, as a party defendant, the abutting owner who successfully challenged the permit before the Board?

Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. James A. Fulton and James W. Macauley, town attorney, in opposition. Decided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fong v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API