Legal Opinion

Wienbrink v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1992No. 01-91-00385-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal of an adjudication of guilt after appellant violated the terms of his deferred adjudication probation. In his sole point of error, appellant contends the trial court erred at the hearing on the motion for adjudication of guilt by denying his motion to suppress evidence of an offense appellant allegedly committed. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant, Roman Sam Wienbrink, was indicted on September 28, 1988, for possessing, with intent to deliver, methamphetamine. Appellant entered a guilty plea without plea bargain or agreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Castro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Francis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Porter Jr., Hubert Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API