Pike County Children & Youth Services v. Strueli
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON Jr., P.J.,
Upon consideration of the motion for summary judgment, and hearing held thereon the court finds the following:(1)All facts have been stipulated and filed with this court on September 23, 1999.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW(1) There is a sound policy favoring retroactivity in most cases. Sutliff v. Sutliff, 339 Pa. Super. 523, 556, 489 A.2d 764, 781 (1985); Gerland v. Gerland, 703 A.2d 70 (Pa. Super. 1997).(2) Consequently, an order denying retroactive support will only be upheld where the trial court articulates a specific and appropriate reason to justify a nonretroactive order.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Shovlin v. ShovlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Strawn v. StrawnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Trosky v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.