Legal Opinion

Seawell v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR and WALKER, JJ., concurring. This is a petition to rehear this case, which was decided132 N.C. 856. The chief exception relied on is the refusal of the judge to nonsuit the plaintiff, on the ground that there was no evidence. The plaintiff, who was a candidate for Lieutenant-Governor of this State, had gone in his canvass of the State to speak at a town (516) where the party whose candidate he was was unpopular. He went back to the railroad station to take the train, and while at the station, with a mileage ticket in his pocket, awaiting the arrival of the train, a mob came up and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spohn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. New Orleans, St. Louis & Chicago Railroad v. BurkeMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PillsburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Seawell v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. McCourry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Lanier v. . Pullman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Britton v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hopkins v. . Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API