Legal Opinion
United States v. Curtis Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 2004No. 03-10516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal by Curtis Anderson, a member of the Robinson Ranchería Band of Pomo Indians, turns on whether 18 U.S.C. § 1162 gives the State of California exclusive jurisdiction over all crimes committed in Indian country within its borders, thereby depriving the district court of jurisdiction in this case. Anderson was convicted of theft, and conspiring to commit theft, from an Indian tribal organization in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1163. He argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of § 1162, and that § 1163 both offends the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Darrell Chip Wadena, United States of America v. Jerry Joseph Rawley, Jr., United States of America v. Rick ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wilmer LOMAYAOMA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard Virgil BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PassaroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LamyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Lezmond Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jeff LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.