United States v. Tripp
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Senior Judge:
Sergeant Tripp was convicted of committing indecent acts.1 On appeal, he asks that we remand his case for an inquiry to determine whether the trial defense counsel had a conflict of interests,2 and he contends that the convening authority’s action violated R.C.M. 1108 and their pretrial agreement. He also contends that the dishonorable discharge adjudged should be disapproved because he misunderstood the pretrial agreement.3 The issue relating to the convening authority’s action has merit and requires us to return the case to the convening authority for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RileyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. RuizUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997