Legal Opinion

Davis v. Kyle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1988No. 87-1229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

The claimant appeals the order of the deputy commissioner (dc), which held that the statute of limitations barred his claim for medical treatment. Because we conclude that the dc erroneously determined that certain evidence introduced by the claimant was irrelevant, we reverse and remand.

*1241The claimant injured his back in an industrial accident which occurred on September 3, 1981. He reached maximum medical improvement in 1982 and was given a disability rating of 0-10% impairment. In the present appeal, the claimant filed a claim for medical treatment and rehabilitative assistance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Williams Roofing, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Johnston v. Super Food ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Iverson v. Holy Cross Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. City of St. Augustine v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardee County Plumbing v. HeflinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. United Way of America v. MerloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API