Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Hartung

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1979No. 41957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spencer, Retired Justice.

This is an action for specific performance of an oral contract to execute a will permitting plaintiff, Harry Rudolph, to purchase farmland at a specific price. After hearing, plaintiff’s petition was dismissed. Two questions are presented by Rudolph’s appeal. (1) Was there an agreement to execute a will? (2) If so, was there sufficient performance to remove the contract from the statute of frauds? We affirm.

Rudolph became a tenant on the Charles McDaniel farm in Sarpy County in late 1953. The farm consisted of 210 acres, divided by the Rock Island Railroad. A tract of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overlander v. WareNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bailey v. MahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lintz v. ApkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Busteed v. SheffieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hein v. M & N Feed Yards, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Patterson v. OyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Theobald v. AgeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Estate of NicholsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API