In the Interest of C. P.

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The putative father of C. P challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating reunification services. He also appeals a separate order placing C. P in the permanent custody of the child’s maternal uncle. For reasons that follow, we affirm.1

1. Before terminating reunification services, “a juvenile court must find by clear and convincing evidence that reasonable efforts to reunify a child with his or her family will be detrimental to the child.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) In the Interest of B. D. G., 262 Ga. App. 843 (586 SE2d 736) (2003). On appeal, we *700construe…