Legal Opinion

Furlong v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of June, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury for $500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 7th day of June," 1904, denying the defendant’s motion for anew trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in an action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the uegligence of a motorman in charge of one of the defendant’s cars. She was riding a bicycle on Forty-third street near Eighth avenue, going from the east to the west and, as she was crossing the westerly track of the defendant’s road on Eighth avenue, she was struck hy a southbound car, was thrown to the ground and injured. She had a verdict in the court below, from the judgment entered upon which and from an order denying a motion for a new trial the defendant has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Little v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Greene v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Little v. . Third Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGurgan v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Hinz v. Eighth Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API