King v. State

James King timely appeals his sentence which was imposed following the trial court’s grant of King’s rule 3.800(a)1 motion to correct an illegal sentence. Concluding that the alleged error was not properly preserved in the trial court, we affirm.

The jury found King guilty of committing nine separate offenses, and the trial court sentenced him as a habitual felony offender on each count. King subsequently filed a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentencing error arguing that the habitual offender sentences were improper. The trial court agreed and ordered a resen-tencing hearing. During the…