Legal Opinion

McCaffrey v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1932No. Claims 19211 and 20150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The claimant accepted employment as a lock laborer in the State service. His wages were fixed by agreement and he has been paid the wages he agreed to accept. The statute (Laws of 1929, ch. 479) does not provide that the wages of a laborer shall be determined by any rule or standard; it does provide that the State shall not pay less than the prevailing rate of wages in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the State where the claimant is employed. All laborers are entitled to the protection of the statute, but when a laborer claims that the stipulated wages which he has received…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Eddy v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Ziegler v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  4. Eddy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Eddy v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API