People v. Ahmed

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, including disproving his defense of justification, is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v McDaniel, 84 AD3d 1410, 1411 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 819 [2011]; People v Walker, 78 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2010]; People v Battle, 73 AD3d 939, 940 [2010]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to…