Legal Opinion

McMullin v. United States

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 22, 2007No. 3:06-CV-00172-GTEPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GARNETT THOMAS EISELE, District Judge.

At the conclusion of the trial the Court made certain findings of fact and stated certain conclusions of law. Those findings and conclusions remain in effect unless changed or modified by the following supplementary findings and conclusions:

I. FINDINGS OF FACT:

1. Garret McMullin was a child born with anatomic heart defects which required two shunt surgeries to properly fix the congenitally altered anatomy of his heart which was not capable, at birth, of properly pumping blood to his lungs. The first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Davis v. ParhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Scarlett v. Rose Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. One National Bank v. PopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Hayes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  3. Kolpek v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  4. Turner v. Faulkner County, ArkansasDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API