Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 1987Published

1DissentEllerin, J.

While we are all in agreement that defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA) was under a duty to provide the prospective passenger, Ms. Blye, with a reasonably safe place from which to board the bus, I cannot acquiesce in the majority’s finding that the defendant here cannot be found negligent because it properly fulfilled that duty as a matter of law. On the contrary, based on the record before us, that issue is a question of fact which the trial court properly submitted to the jury, together with the issues of proximate cause and contributory negligence,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Havas v. Victory Paper Stock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API