Legal Opinion

Mosher v. Canfield

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1930No. Civil No. 2835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The plaintiff, Hattie L. Mosher, brought this action against O. C. Canfield, alleging that he owed her for rent the sum of $1,410. Canfield answered that the debt was that of C. C. Canfield and Loy H. Wallace, a copartnership, and asked that suit be abated. The court, after hearing the evidence, refused to abate the action, but granted Canfield’s motion to require plaintiff to make Wallace a defendant, and this was done by amendment of the complaint. The defendants’ answer to the amended complaint admitted the indebtedness and counterclaimed for work and material rendered and furnished…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hot Oil Service, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Alfalfa Seed & Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hot Oil Service, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API