Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 3, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that the reduction in claimant’s allotted time for lunch from one hour to 45 minutes was not a substantial change in the terms of her employment, and that she therefore left her employment without good cause, is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Famulare…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FamulareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. In re LubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. In re the Claim of WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. In re the Claim of SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API