State v. Gambling Device
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
This appeal arises from a forfeiture proceeding instituted by the State of Texas pursuant to article 18.18 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (Vernon 1993). In three points of error, the State appeals the trial court’s denial of its petition for forfeiture. We reverse and remand.
I. Fact Summary
On December 2, 1990, the State seized a trailer containing 24 “Bulldozer” games, which were being operated on a grocery store parking lot. The seized games fall within a category of amusement games known as “pusher” machines or “penny falls.” These games generally consist of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Wofford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Dew-Becker v. WuIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- People v. TurnerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
- Mark Steven Virovatz v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.