Legal Opinion

Baum v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1982No. 79CA0585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mary and James Baum, brought this action for slander, false arrest, and malicious prosecution. The jury in the first trial found all issues in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs, however, were granted a new trial based upon errors in certain jury instructions. A second trial was held and a verdict rendered in favor of the Baums against all defendants for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. We agree and therefore reverse and remand.

This court is not restricted to reviewing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Callaham v. SlavskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. First Nat. Bank of Canon City v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. DeMott v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Mohler v. PARK CTY. SCH. DIST. RE-2Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Block v. BalajtyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chrysler Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Vikell Investors Pacific, Inc. v. Kip Hampden Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Nichols v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Skeescorp v. SimonColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API