Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2016No. G050927PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’LEARY, P.J.—

Joshua Perez appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of three counts of attempted premeditated murder, discharging a firearm with gross negligence, and vandalism and found true firearm enhancements. Perez argues his 86-year-to-life sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Although we disagree his 86-year-to-life sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, we must remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm the judgment and order a limited remand.

FACTS

One evening, “Mobbing our Professions Crew” (MOPC) gang…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. CostellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Tran, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Suarez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. (HC) Hicks v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API